Stephen Greenblatt & George Will

I think Mr. Greenblatts points out states that not all literature ia political. Unlike George Will who says "All literature...is political." Greenblatt questions why will cant enjoy Sheakspeares writing without trying to find a political meaning behind it. Throughout Greenblatts article he seems distraut that will finds all literature one way. He is troubled by how will thinks too much about the peices he reads. George Will seems to think that if you argue that all literature isnt political you are full of stupidity. I think the reason will is so passionate in his opinion towards Greenblatt is only partly because of how Greenblatt veiws literature, i think it is also how Greenblatt veiws politics that shapes wills opinion of him and throughout his article it turns into that than the issue of Lynne v. Cheney being on the NEH advisory board? I agreed moreso with Stephen Greenblatt because i agree that all literature is NOT political. Certainly someone could argue that but in my opinion not verything has a political meaning. Sure, Many authors, playwrites, and journalists write their works with this hidden agenda but i think itsall about how you interpret what your reading. Take StarWars for example, George lucas didnt purposely create all the hidden symbols and connections to religion when he wrote the saga, but many people watch those films and mold their own opinions about what Lucas was trying to say.